In Jeff Jarvis’ article “The Press Becomes the
Press-Sphere”, he describes two different ways to retrieve information. There
is the press sphere and the me-sphere. I could relate more to the me-sphere
because it is how I receive my news. As I have discussed in my last two blogs,
my main two information sources are Facebook and through friends. When I was
looking at the me-sphere picture, a few of the bubbles stuck out to me. The
peers bubble was the largest. This would make sense to me because out of all
the bubbles, my peers are where I get the most information. There were a few bubbles
that were the same size: companies, media, and search. These bubbles related to
one another. From media, such as Facebook, radio, and television, companies
would put advertisements on these media sources. By searching on the internet,
I would also run into advertisements. This is a way for me to receive news from
companies, about their products and what they have been working on. Jarvis also talked about what a press sphere
was. A press sphere is where the press receives their information. They receive
their information from many sources, such as the government, witnesses, data,
and observes. Most of the bubbles are the same size, so they receive their information
almost equally from all the sources. The biggest bubble, however, is the
witness bubble. This would also make sense when comparing the me-sphere with
the press sphere. In the me-sphere the biggest bubble is peers, which is word
of mouth communication. Witnesses are also word of mouth communication. Jarvis’
article is a little confusing to understand. His descriptions of his figures
were not very clear. By reading New York Times, I have noticed that the press
receives a lot of their news by interviewing witnesses. The press has to do a
lot of work in order to have a good story.
I would have to say that I also get most of my information from the me-sphere. Rarely do I go out and seek information but rather I hear it through social media and friends. Also, when reading the article I noticed as well that it was fairly confusing. It was hard to truly understand what he was saying.
ReplyDelete